AI in Labour Law: How Jurilo Performs Compared to ChatGPT and Claude
Many users wonder how accurate Jurilo really is — especially compared to well-known AI models such as ChatGPT and Claude.
We decided to find out and conducted a comprehensive benchmark test.
The Test
We used 60 real questions from Swiss labour law, the same ones we rely on internally to measure and improve Jurilo’s performance.
All answers were verified by Streiff von Kaenel, one of Switzerland’s leading labour law firms, which also validates our content weekly.
The evaluation followed a 10-point scoring system, assessing both legal accuracy and clarity.
The Results
With an impressive 9.8 out of 10, Jurilo clearly leads the field.
While general-purpose AI models like ChatGPT or Claude can provide useful background information, they lack the legal grounding and Swiss-specific context (Code of Obligations, Labour Act, collective agreements, and case law).
Jurilo, in contrast:
- Is based on verified Swiss legal answers,
- Is reviewed weekly by lawyers,
- Understands legal exceptions and nuances,
- Provides precise legal references (articles and court cases).
Conclusion
AI can assist with legal questions — but law demands precision.
Thanks to its Swiss legal focus and validation process, Jurilo achieves a quality level that even the most advanced general AIs cannot yet match.
➡️ Try Jurilo for free and experience the difference between general-purpose AI and a Swiss-verified legal assistant.
👉 Try it now
Note
During the creation of the comparison chart, an interesting phenomenon occurred:
ChatGPT, which generated the image, repeatedly displayed 7.2 as shorter than 6.9, even after several correction attempts.
A small but vivid example of “AI hallucination” — and another reason why Jurilo relies on verified, tested, and legally reviewed answers, not on generic language models.
